Education Q&A
Compare how accurately AI models solve educational and exam-style questions.
In this genre, the main abilities being tested are Correctness, Reasoning Quality, Completeness.
Unlike explanation, this genre leans more toward reaching the right answer on exam-style questions than toward tailoring the teaching style for a reader.
A high score here does not guarantee creativity, persuasive writing, or broad performance on open-ended planning tasks.
Strong models here are useful for
study support, textbook-style questions, and problems where answer accuracy matters first.
This genre alone cannot tell you
whether the model is best for long-form explanation, brainstorming, or business communication.
Education Q&A: Claude Fable 5 sets the standard, GPT-5 mini keeps winning everything it faces
Anthropic
OpenAI
Anthropic
Average score by model
What we weighted
Claude Fable 5 opened its account here with the strongest single showing in the genre, and Claude Sonnet 5 also won its debut. But the backbone of this table is GPT-5 mini: it has answered more judged questions than any of the leaders and has yet to lose a matchup. In a genre about getting the answer right, an unbeaten record across repeated outings is exactly the kind of evidence that matters.
Correctness carries by far the heaviest weight in this genre — heavier than anywhere else on the site — with reasoning quality next. That shapes the rest of the table in a particular way: Gemini 2.5 Pro often writes answers whose averages look perfectly healthy, yet it has not converted a single matchup, because a nearly-right answer loses to a right one. The lighter Gemini tiers occasionally steal a win, and GPT-5.5 has split its outings.
The usual caveat cuts both ways here. The new Claude models’ perfect starts rest on very few questions; GPT-5 mini’s record rests on more. Exam-style questions also span wildly different subjects, so a model’s standing can shift as the mix of topics grows. These are measurements under Orivel’s conditions, not a general grade in every subject.
Bottom line
For accuracy-first Q&A, GPT-5 mini is the proven pick and remarkable value; Claude Fable 5’s debut suggests a new ceiling for the genre. Gemini 2.5 Pro’s healthy averages without wins show how unforgiving a correctness-weighted genre is.
This analysis is derived from Orivel's measured benchmark scores for this genre and is updated periodically. Scores are condition-dependent measurements, not absolute truth.
Top Models in This Genre
This ranking is ordered by average score within this genre only.
Latest Updated: Aug 9, 2026 09:46
Win Rate
Average Score
Win Rate
Average Score
Win Rate
Average Score
Win Rate
Average Score
Win Rate
Average Score
Win Rate
Average Score
Win Rate
Average Score
| Ranked Models | Detail | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic |
100%
|
95
|
1 | 1 | View scores and evaluation for Claude Fable 5 |
| #2 | GPT-5 mini | OpenAI |
100%
|
90
|
5 | 5 | View scores and evaluation for GPT-5 mini |
| #3 | Claude Sonnet 5 NEW | Anthropic |
100%
|
90
|
1 | 1 | View scores and evaluation for Claude Sonnet 5 |
| #4 | GPT-5.5 | OpenAI |
50%
|
90
|
1 | 2 | View scores and evaluation for GPT-5.5 |
| #5 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
20%
|
63
|
1 | 5 | View scores and evaluation for Gemini 2.5 Flash | |
| #6 | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
14%
|
72
|
1 | 7 | View scores and evaluation for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | |
| #7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
0%
|
84
|
0 | 4 | View scores and evaluation for Gemini 2.5 Pro |
What Is Evaluated in Education Q&A
Scoring criteria and weight used for this genre ranking.
Correctness
45.0%
This criterion is included to check Correctness in the answer. It carries heavier weight because this part strongly shapes the overall result in this genre.
Reasoning Quality
20.0%
This criterion is included to check Reasoning Quality in the answer. It has meaningful weight because it affects quality in a visible way, even if it is not the only thing that matters.
Completeness
15.0%
This criterion is included to check Completeness in the answer. It is weighted more lightly because it supports the main goal rather than defining the genre by itself.
Clarity
10.0%
This criterion is included to check Clarity in the answer. It is weighted more lightly because it supports the main goal rather than defining the genre by itself.
Instruction Following
10.0%
This criterion is included to check Instruction Following in the answer. It is weighted more lightly because it supports the main goal rather than defining the genre by itself.
Recent tasks
Education Q&A
Adjacency in a Random Derangement
A permutation π of {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} is written as the sequence π(1),π(2),…,π(8). A derangement is a permutation satisfying π(i) ≠ i for every i. Choose uniformly at random from all derangements of these eight numbers. Find the exact probability that the values 1 and 2 occur in adjacent positions, in either order. Your solution must derive both the total number of derangements and the number satisfying the adjacency condition, using a valid counting argument such as inclusion–exclusion; an unsupported numerical result is not sufficient. Then compute the corresponding probability for an unrestricted uniformly random permutation of the eight numbers, and state whether conditioning on being a derangement increases or decreases the probability of adjacency.
Education Q&A
Biased Coin Pattern Race
Exam-style question: A coin has probability p of landing heads on each flip, where 0 < p < 1. Let q = 1 - p. You flip the coin repeatedly until one of the two three-flip patterns HTH or HHT appears for the first time as a consecutive block. For example, in the sequence T H H T, the pattern HHT appears ending on the fourth flip. Answer the following: What is the probability that HTH appears before HHT? What is the expected number of flips until either HTH or HHT first appears? Briefly explain why a solution that treats non-overlapping blocks of three flips as independent trials gives the wrong result.
Education Q&A
Physics Problem: The Grandfather Clock's Time Warp
A grandfather clock uses a brass pendulum to keep time, and it is calibrated to be perfectly accurate at a room temperature of 20.0°C. During a summer heatwave, the average room temperature rises to 35.0°C. Based on the provided context, answer the following: Calculate the new length of the brass pendulum. Assume its original length (at 20.0°C) was exactly 1.000 meter. Calculate the new period of the pendulum at 35.0°C. Determine how many seconds the clock will gain or lose in one 24-hour period (which is 86,400 seconds). Provide a clear, step-by-step explanation of the physical principles that lead to your conclusion, detailing how temperature affects the clock's accuracy.
Education Q&A
Hormonal Control of the Menstrual Cycle
A patient is diagnosed with a rare genetic condition that results in the complete inability of their pituitary gland to produce Luteinizing Hormone (LH), while Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) production remains normal. Explain the cascading physiological effects this specific deficiency would have on the patient's menstrual cycle. Your explanation should detail the expected changes in the follicular phase, ovulation, the luteal phase, and the uterine lining throughout a typical cycle. Assume the patient is of reproductive age and otherwise healthy.
Education Q&A
Explain Why Ice Floats: A Hard Chemistry Exam Question
Solid water (ice) is less dense than liquid water near 0 °C, which is unusual compared with most substances whose solid phases are denser than their liquid phases. Write an exam-style essay answer (roughly 350–550 words) that addresses ALL of the following points: State the approximate densities of ice at 0 °C and liquid water at 0 °C and at 4 °C, and identify the temperature at which liquid water reaches its maximum density. Explain, at the molecular level, why ice has a lower density than liquid water. Your explanation must reference: hydrogen bonding, the tetrahedral coordination of water molecules in hexagonal ice (Ih), and the open lattice structure with empty cavities. Explain why liquid water near 0 °C is denser than ice but still less dense than water at 4 °C. Describe the competition between two effects as temperature rises from 0 °C to 4 °C: the partial collapse of residual ice-like hydrogen-bonded clusters (which increases density) and normal thermal expansion (which decreases density). Give at least two important ecological or geophysical consequences of this anomaly (for example, lake stratification in winter, survival of aquatic life, or the behavior of sea ice). Briefly compare water with one other small molecule (e.g., H2S, NH3, or CH4) to show why hydrogen bonding specifically — not just molecular size or polarity — is responsible for the anomaly. Be precise with terminology (e.g., "hydrogen bond" vs. "covalent bond", "density" vs. "specific volume"). Where you cite numerical values, give them with appropriate units and reasonable significant figures.
Education Q&A
Analyze Why a Product Is Not a Polynomial
A student claims that because f(x) = (x^2 - 1)/(x - 1) simplifies to x + 1 for x ≠ 1, the function g(x) = ((x^2 - 1)/(x - 1)) · |x - 1| is a polynomial equal to (x + 1)|x - 1|. Evaluate this claim. Answer all parts: Simplify g(x) as much as possible for x ≠ 1. Determine whether g(x) can be extended to a polynomial on all real numbers. Justify your conclusion. State whether g is differentiable at x = 1, and show the key calculation that supports your answer. Briefly explain the conceptual mistake in the student's reasoning. Your answer should be mathematically rigorous but understandable to a strong high-school student.