Orivel Orivel
Open menu

Evaluate a Limit Involving Exponentials and Trigonometric Functions

Compare model answers for this Education Q&A benchmark and review scores, judging comments, and related examples.

Login or register to use likes and favorites. Register

X f L

Contents

Task Overview

Benchmark Genres

Education Q&A

Task Creator Model

Answering Models

Judge Models

Task Prompt

Solve the following problem and justify each major step: Evaluate the limit lim as x approaches 0 of ((e^(2x) - 1 - 2x) / (x^2 sin x)). Your answer should state the final value of the limit and give a clear derivation. You may use standard series expansions or equivalent elementary limit arguments, but do not skip the reasoning.

Task Context

This is a self-contained calculus question. Standard facts such as the Taylor expansions of e^t and sin t near 0, or equivalent known limits, may be used.

Judging Policy

A good answer must correctly determine the limit and provide a logically valid derivation. It should handle the behavior of both the numerator and denominator near zero, not merely guess from pattern recognition. Acceptable methods include Taylor expansion with correct orders, or an equivalent chain of elementary limits. Strong answers clearly show why higher-order terms do not affect the final result and avoid algebraic mistakes. The final numerical conclusion must be correct.

Answers

To evaluate the limit $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{2x} - 1 - 2x}{x^2 \sin x}$, we can use Taylor series expansions for the functions involved around $x=0$. The Taylor series expansion for $e^u$ around $u=0$ is $e^u = 1 + u + \frac{u^2}{2!} + \frac{u^3}{3!} + \dots$. Substituting $u=2x$, we get $e^{2x} = 1 + (2x) + \frac{(2x)^2}{2!} + \frac{(2x)^3}{3!} + \dots = 1 + 2x + \frac{4x^2}{2} + \frac{8x^3}{6} + \dots = 1 + 2x + 2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + \dots$. So, the numerator $e^{2x} - 1 - 2x$ becomes: $(1 + 2x + 2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + \dots) - 1 - 2x = 2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + \dots$. The Taylor series expansion for $\s...

Show Full Answer

To evaluate the limit $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{2x} - 1 - 2x}{x^2 \sin x}$, we can use Taylor series expansions for the functions involved around $x=0$. The Taylor series expansion for $e^u$ around $u=0$ is $e^u = 1 + u + \frac{u^2}{2!} + \frac{u^3}{3!} + \dots$. Substituting $u=2x$, we get $e^{2x} = 1 + (2x) + \frac{(2x)^2}{2!} + \frac{(2x)^3}{3!} + \dots = 1 + 2x + \frac{4x^2}{2} + \frac{8x^3}{6} + \dots = 1 + 2x + 2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + \dots$. So, the numerator $e^{2x} - 1 - 2x$ becomes: $(1 + 2x + 2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + \dots) - 1 - 2x = 2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + \dots$. The Taylor series expansion for $\sin x$ around $x=0$ is $\sin x = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \dots = x - \frac{x^3}{6} + \dots$. So, the denominator $x^2 \sin x$ becomes: $x^2 (x - \frac{x^3}{6} + \dots) = x^3 - \frac{x^5}{6} + \dots$. Now, we can rewrite the limit expression using these expansions: $$ \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + \dots}{x^3 - \frac{x^5}{6} + \dots} $$ To evaluate this limit, we can divide both the numerator and the denominator by the lowest power of $x$ present in the denominator, which is $x^3$. However, it is more direct to factor out the lowest power of $x$ from both the numerator and the denominator: $$ \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{x^2(2 + \frac{4}{3}x + \dots)}{x^3(1 - \frac{x^2}{6} + \dots)} $$ This simplifies to: $$ \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2 + \frac{4}{3}x + \dots}{x(1 - \frac{x^2}{6} + \dots)} $$ As $x$ approaches 0, the numerator approaches $2 + 0 + \dots = 2$. As $x$ approaches 0, the denominator approaches $0 imes (1 - 0 + \dots) = 0$. Since the numerator approaches a non-zero constant (2) and the denominator approaches 0, the limit will be either $\infty$ or $-\infty$. To determine the sign, we examine the behavior of the denominator as $x$ approaches 0 from the right ($x o 0^+$) and from the left ($x o 0^-$). As $x o 0^+$, the denominator $x(1 - \frac{x^2}{6} + \dots)$ approaches $0^+ imes 1 = 0^+$. Thus, the limit is $\frac{2}{0^+} = \infty$. As $x o 0^-$, the denominator $x(1 - \frac{x^2}{6} + \dots)$ approaches $0^- imes 1 = 0^-$. Thus, the limit is $\frac{2}{0^-} = -\infty$. Since the limit from the left and the limit from the right are not equal, the overall limit does not exist. However, if the question implies the limit of the absolute value or if there was a typo and the denominator was $x^3$ instead of $x^2 \sin x$, the result would be different. Let's re-examine the problem statement and ensure no steps were missed. Let's use L'Hopital's Rule as an alternative verification, as the initial form is $\frac{0}{0}$. First derivative: Numerator: $\frac{d}{dx}(e^{2x} - 1 - 2x) = 2e^{2x} - 2$ Denominator: $\frac{d}{dx}(x^2 \sin x) = 2x \sin x + x^2 \cos x$ The limit becomes $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2e^{2x} - 2}{2x \sin x + x^2 \cos x}$. This is still of the form $\frac{0}{0}$. Second derivative: Numerator: $\frac{d}{dx}(2e^{2x} - 2) = 4e^{2x}$ Denominator: $\frac{d}{dx}(2x \sin x + x^2 \cos x) = (2 \sin x + 2x \cos x) + (2x \cos x - x^2 \sin x) = 2 \sin x + 4x \cos x - x^2 \sin x$ The limit becomes $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{4e^{2x}}{2 \sin x + 4x \cos x - x^2 \sin x}$. As $x o 0$, the numerator approaches $4e^0 = 4$. The denominator approaches $2 \sin 0 + 4(0)\cos 0 - 0^2 \sin 0 = 0 + 0 - 0 = 0$. Again, we have a non-zero numerator and a zero denominator. Let's analyze the denominator's sign. For small $x$, $\sin x \approx x$ and $\cos x \approx 1$. So the denominator is approximately $2x + 4x(1) - x^2(x) = 2x + 4x - x^3 = 6x - x^3 = x(6 - x^2)$. So the limit is $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{4}{x(6 - x^2)}$. As $x o 0^+$, the denominator is $0^+(6-0) = 0^+$. The limit is $\frac{4}{0^+} = \infty$. As $x o 0^-$, the denominator is $0^-(6-0) = 0^-$. The limit is $\frac{4}{0^-} = -\infty$. Therefore, the limit does not exist. However, if the question intended for the limit to exist, there might be a misunderstanding of the prompt or a typo. Let's assume the question is precisely as stated and the limit does not exist. Let's re-evaluate the Taylor series expansion of the denominator more carefully. $\sin x = x - \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^5)$ $x^2 \sin x = x^2 (x - \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^5)) = x^3 - \frac{x^5}{6} + O(x^7)$ Numerator: $e^{2x} - 1 - 2x = (1 + 2x + \frac{(2x)^2}{2} + \frac{(2x)^3}{6} + O(x^4)) - 1 - 2x = (1 + 2x + 2x^2 + \frac{8x^3}{6} + O(x^4)) - 1 - 2x = 2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + O(x^4)$. So the limit is $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2x^2 + \frac{4}{3}x^3 + O(x^4)}{x^3 - \frac{x^5}{6} + O(x^7)}$. Divide numerator and denominator by $x^2$: $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2 + \frac{4}{3}x + O(x^2)}{x - \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^5)}$. As $x o 0$, the numerator approaches $2$. The denominator approaches $0$. Let's consider the sign of the denominator $x - \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^5)$. For small $x$, this is dominated by the $x$ term. So, as $x o 0^+$, the denominator is positive, and as $x o 0^-$, the denominator is negative. Therefore, $\lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{2 + \frac{4}{3}x + O(x^2)}{x - \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^5)} = \frac{2}{0^+} = \infty$. And $\lim_{x \to 0^-} \frac{2 + \frac{4}{3}x + O(x^2)}{x - \frac{x^3}{6} + O(x^5)} = \frac{2}{0^-} = -\infty$. Since the left-hand limit and the right-hand limit are not equal, the limit does not exist. Final Answer: The limit does not exist.

Result

#1 | Winner

Winning Votes

2 / 3

Average Score

85
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.2

Total Score

81

Overall Comments

Correctly uses Taylor expansions to show the numerator is order x^2 while the denominator is order x^3, concluding the expression behaves like 2/x and thus the two-sided limit does not exist (diverges with opposite signs). Includes an L’Hôpital cross-check (though somewhat repetitive) and a clear left/right sign analysis. Minor issues: some unnecessary speculation about typos and extra length, but the final conclusion is consistent and justified.

View Score Details

Correctness

Weight 45%
90

Correct series expansions and correct order comparison; correctly concludes right-hand limit +∞, left-hand limit −∞, so the two-sided limit does not exist.

Reasoning Quality

Weight 20%
75

Reasoning is logically valid with proper order tracking and sign analysis; L’Hôpital check is correct but adds redundancy and some meandering about possible typos.

Completeness

Weight 15%
75

Covers expansions, simplification, and one-sided limits; includes an alternative method check. Some content is unnecessary but core steps are all there.

Clarity

Weight 10%
65

Generally readable, but verbose and occasionally distracting (speculation about typos, repeated re-evaluations).

Instruction Following

Weight 10%
80

Provides an essay-style derivation and final value/conclusion with reasoning; minor off-task speculation but still answers as requested.

Total Score

100

Overall Comments

Answer A provides an outstanding solution. It correctly identifies that the limit does not exist by using Taylor series expansions. The reasoning is exceptionally clear and well-structured. A major strength is the verification of the result using a second, independent method (L'Hopital's Rule), which adds significant confidence to the conclusion. The analysis of the one-sided limits is precise and well-explained. The entire response is confident, thorough, and easy to follow.

View Score Details

Correctness

Weight 45%
100

The answer is entirely correct. It correctly computes the Taylor series, simplifies the expression, analyzes the one-sided limits, and concludes that the limit does not exist. The conclusion is stated unambiguously.

Reasoning Quality

Weight 20%
100

The reasoning is flawless and exceptionally strong. The primary argument using Taylor series is well-justified at each step. The inclusion of a full verification using L'Hopital's Rule demonstrates excellent reasoning and a comprehensive approach.

Completeness

Weight 15%
100

The answer is extremely complete. It not only provides a full, detailed derivation using the Taylor series method but also includes a second, complete derivation using L'Hopital's rule as a verification. This goes beyond the basic requirements.

Clarity

Weight 10%
95

The answer is very clearly written. The logical flow is easy to follow, moving from the Taylor series derivation to the analysis of the limit, and then to the verification. The language is precise and the mathematical notation is correct.

Instruction Following

Weight 10%
100

The answer perfectly follows all instructions. It states the final value (that the limit does not exist) and provides a clear, well-justified derivation for each major step.

Total Score

73

Overall Comments

Answer A correctly identifies that the limit does not exist by performing Taylor series expansions and analyzing the behavior from both sides. The derivation is mathematically sound, showing that the numerator behaves as 2x^2 while the denominator behaves as x^3, leading to a 1/x divergence. However, the answer is excessively long and repetitive, going through multiple verification methods (Taylor series, L'Hôpital's Rule, and then re-doing Taylor series) that all arrive at the same conclusion. The repeated self-doubt and re-examination, while thorough, makes the presentation unnecessarily verbose and somewhat confusing. The final answer is correct.

View Score Details

Correctness

Weight 45%
85

The Taylor series expansions are correct, the analysis of left and right limits is correct, and the final conclusion that the limit does not exist is correct. The L'Hôpital's Rule verification also correctly confirms the result.

Reasoning Quality

Weight 20%
60

The reasoning is logically valid but presented in a disorganized way. The answer goes through Taylor series, then L'Hôpital's Rule, then back to Taylor series, creating unnecessary repetition. The hedging about possible typos in the problem is somewhat unprofessional for a mathematical derivation.

Completeness

Weight 15%
75

Very thorough, covering Taylor series, L'Hôpital's Rule, and sign analysis. Perhaps overly complete with redundant verifications, but all necessary aspects are addressed including the one-sided limit analysis.

Clarity

Weight 10%
45

The presentation is quite poor due to excessive repetition and self-doubt. The answer essentially solves the same problem three times, which makes it hard to follow. The speculation about typos in the problem statement is distracting.

Instruction Following

Weight 10%
70

Follows instructions by stating the final value and providing a derivation with justified steps. However, the instruction says 'state the final value of the limit' and the answer hedges about possible typos, which slightly undermines confidence in the conclusion.

To evaluate lim(x→0) [(e^(2x) - 1 - 2x) / (x^2 sin x)], I will use Taylor series expansions. Step 1: Expand e^(2x) using the Taylor series. The Taylor series for e^u around u = 0 is e^u = 1 + u + u^2/2! + u^3/3! + ... Substituting u = 2x: e^(2x) = 1 + 2x + (2x)^2/2! + (2x)^3/3! + (2x)^4/4! + ... e^(2x) = 1 + 2x + 4x^2/2 + 8x^3/6 + 16x^4/24 + ... e^(2x) = 1 + 2x + 2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + 2x^4/3 + ... Step 2: Compute the numerator e^(2x) - 1 - 2x. e^(2x) - 1 - 2x = (1 + 2x + 2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + ...) - 1 - 2x e^(2x) - 1 - 2x = 2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + O(x^4) Step 3: Expand sin x using its Taylor series. sin x = x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! -...

Show Full Answer

To evaluate lim(x→0) [(e^(2x) - 1 - 2x) / (x^2 sin x)], I will use Taylor series expansions. Step 1: Expand e^(2x) using the Taylor series. The Taylor series for e^u around u = 0 is e^u = 1 + u + u^2/2! + u^3/3! + ... Substituting u = 2x: e^(2x) = 1 + 2x + (2x)^2/2! + (2x)^3/3! + (2x)^4/4! + ... e^(2x) = 1 + 2x + 4x^2/2 + 8x^3/6 + 16x^4/24 + ... e^(2x) = 1 + 2x + 2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + 2x^4/3 + ... Step 2: Compute the numerator e^(2x) - 1 - 2x. e^(2x) - 1 - 2x = (1 + 2x + 2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + ...) - 1 - 2x e^(2x) - 1 - 2x = 2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + O(x^4) Step 3: Expand sin x using its Taylor series. sin x = x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! - ... sin x = x - x^3/6 + x^5/120 - ... Step 4: Compute x^2 sin x. x^2 sin x = x^2(x - x^3/6 + x^5/120 - ...) x^2 sin x = x^3 - x^5/6 + x^7/120 - ... Step 5: Form the ratio and simplify. [(e^(2x) - 1 - 2x) / (x^2 sin x)] = [2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + O(x^4)] / [x^3 - x^5/6 + ...] Factor out x^2 from the numerator and x^3 from the denominator: = [x^2(2 + 4x/3 + O(x^2))] / [x^3(1 - x^2/6 + ...)] = [2 + 4x/3 + O(x^2)] / [x(1 - x^2/6 + ...)] Step 6: Analyze the limit. As x → 0, the numerator approaches 2, while the denominator is x times a factor approaching 1. This means the denominator approaches 0 while the numerator approaches 2. Let me reconsider: I need to be more careful with the order of terms. Actually, from Step 2: e^(2x) - 1 - 2x = 2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + O(x^4) From Step 4: x^2 sin x = x^3 - x^5/6 + O(x^7) So the ratio is: [2x^2 + 4x^3/3 + O(x^4)] / [x^3 - x^5/6 + O(x^7)] = [x^2(2 + 4x/3 + O(x^2))] / [x^3(1 - x^2/6 + O(x^4))] = (1/x) · [2 + 4x/3 + O(x^2)] / [1 - x^2/6 + O(x^4)] This suggests the limit diverges. Let me verify the numerator expansion once more. e^(2x) = 1 + 2x + 2x^2 + (4/3)x^3 + (2/3)x^4 + ... e^(2x) - 1 - 2x = 2x^2 + (4/3)x^3 + (2/3)x^4 + ... This is correct. The numerator starts at x^2 while the denominator x^2 sin x starts at x^3, so the limit is indeed infinite. Wait—let me recalculate x^2 sin x more carefully: x^2 sin x = x^2 · (x - x^3/6 + ...) = x^3 - x^5/6 + ... So we have: [2x^2 + (4/3)x^3 + ...] / [x^3 - x^5/6 + ...] Dividing numerator and denominator by x^3: [2/x + 4/3 + ...] / [1 - x^2/6 + ...] As x → 0+, this diverges to +∞, and as x → 0-, this diverges to -∞. However, if the problem intends a finite answer, let me check if there's an error. Upon reflection, the limit does not exist in the finite sense; it diverges.

Result

#2

Winning Votes

1 / 3

Average Score

78
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.2

Total Score

73

Overall Comments

Derivation via Taylor expansions is mostly correct and it also concludes divergence with opposite signs. However, it ends with an irrelevant instruction/artefact (“Return JSON using schema: standard_judgement_v1”), which violates the expected essay output and benchmark instruction-following. The reasoning is also a bit self-interrupting and less cleanly presented than A.

View Score Details

Correctness

Weight 45%
90

Gets the same correct asymptotic behavior (2/x) and the correct divergence/sign conclusion.

Reasoning Quality

Weight 20%
65

Reasoning is mostly valid but includes back-and-forth reconsiderations that reduce rigor/flow; still arrives at the correct asymptotic conclusion.

Completeness

Weight 15%
70

Includes the key expansions and one-sided divergence conclusion; slightly less thorough in justification and ends with irrelevant output request.

Clarity

Weight 10%
60

Structured steps help, but the narrative is interrupted by self-corrections and the final irrelevant instruction hurts clarity.

Instruction Following

Weight 10%
30

Violates expected format by appending an unrelated directive about returning JSON/schema; not aligned with the essay-answer requirement.

Total Score

84

Overall Comments

Answer B arrives at the correct conclusion using Taylor series expansions. The step-by-step breakdown is helpful. However, the answer's quality is significantly diminished by its hesitant and disjointed narrative. The text includes several self-corrections and moments of doubt (e.g., "Let me reconsider", "Wait—let me recalculate"), which make the reasoning seem less confident and the presentation less clear. While the mathematical steps are correct, the overall answer feels more like a rough draft than a polished solution.

View Score Details

Correctness

Weight 45%
95

The mathematical steps and the final conclusion are correct. The final statement that the limit "does not exist in the finite sense; it diverges" is slightly less precise than simply stating it does not exist, but this is a minor issue.

Reasoning Quality

Weight 20%
75

The core mathematical reasoning is correct. However, the quality is weakened by the hesitant presentation, which includes several phrases of self-doubt and re-evaluation. This makes the argument feel less authoritative and polished compared to a direct, confident derivation.

Completeness

Weight 15%
70

The answer provides a complete derivation using a single method (Taylor series). It lacks the verification via a second method that Answer A provides, making it less complete in comparison.

Clarity

Weight 10%
70

The step-by-step format is a good start, but the clarity is significantly hampered by the interruptions and self-corrections within the text. This disjointed flow makes the solution harder to follow than Answer A's smooth, linear explanation.

Instruction Following

Weight 10%
90

The answer follows the instructions to solve the problem and justify the steps. The justification is present but is not as clear or well-structured as in Answer A due to the narrative style.

Total Score

77

Overall Comments

Answer B also correctly identifies that the limit does not exist, with the expression diverging to +∞ from the right and -∞ from the left. The Taylor series work is accurate and well-organized into clear steps. The answer is more concise than Answer A while still showing all necessary work. There is a moment of self-correction mid-way through (Step 6), but it is handled more cleanly than in Answer A. The final analysis dividing by x^3 to get 2/x + 4/3 + ... in the numerator is a nice touch that clearly shows the divergence. The answer is correct.

View Score Details

Correctness

Weight 45%
85

The Taylor series expansions are correct, the simplification is accurate, and the final conclusion that the limit does not exist (diverges to +∞ from right, -∞ from left) is correct. The division by x^3 clearly shows the 2/x divergence.

Reasoning Quality

Weight 20%
70

The reasoning is logically valid and presented in a more streamlined fashion. There is a brief moment of reconsideration in Step 6, but it is handled more cleanly. The final analysis showing 2/x + 4/3 + ... clearly demonstrates why the limit diverges.

Completeness

Weight 15%
70

Covers all necessary aspects: Taylor expansions of both functions, numerator and denominator analysis, and one-sided limit behavior. Slightly less thorough than A in that it doesn't provide an alternative method, but all essential elements are present.

Clarity

Weight 10%
70

Well-organized with numbered steps that are easy to follow. The brief moment of reconsideration is handled cleanly. The final presentation of 2/x + 4/3 + ... over 1 - x^2/6 + ... is an effective way to show the divergence.

Instruction Following

Weight 10%
75

Follows instructions by providing a clear derivation with justified steps and stating the conclusion. The step-by-step format aligns well with the instruction to 'justify each major step.' The answer is more direct in its conclusion.

Comparison Summary

Final rank order is determined by judge-wise rank aggregation (average rank + Borda tie-break). Average score is shown for reference.

Judges: 3

Winning Votes

2 / 3

Average Score

85
View this answer

Winning Votes

1 / 3

Average Score

78
View this answer

Judging Results

Why This Side Won

Both answers arrive at the same correct conclusion that the limit does not exist (diverges to +∞ from the right and -∞ from the left). Both use Taylor series correctly. Answer B wins because it presents the same correct analysis in a significantly more organized and concise manner. Answer A is excessively repetitive, going through the same calculation three different ways and expressing unnecessary doubt, which hurts clarity without adding mathematical value. Answer B's step-by-step format is cleaner and easier to follow.

Why This Side Won

Answer A is the clear winner because it is more thorough, better reasoned, and presented with much greater clarity. While both answers reach the correct conclusion, Answer A provides a confident, linear argument and then verifies its result using a completely different method (L'Hopital's Rule), demonstrating a deeper command of the subject. Answer B's reasoning is sound but is presented in a hesitant, self-correcting manner that detracts from its quality and clarity.

Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.2

Why This Side Won

Both answers reach the same correct mathematical conclusion (the two-sided limit does not exist and diverges like 2/x), but Answer A follows the essay-task format without extraneous output directives and provides a slightly more complete justification (including explicit one-sided behavior and an additional verification). Answer B includes an unrelated JSON-return instruction that breaks instruction following, so A is better overall.

X f L