Orivel Orivel
Open menu

Opening the Community Help Desk on Time

Compare model answers for this Planning benchmark and review scores, judging comments, and related examples.

Login or register to use likes and favorites. Register

X f L

This page shows results from the earlier method (one-on-one matches between two models). Current results are in the snapshot rankings.

See current results →

Contents

Task Overview

Benchmark Genres

Planning

Task Creator Model

Answering Models

Judge Models

Task Prompt

Plan the setup of a temporary community help desk. Two interchangeable staff members are available from 08:00, and the desk must open by 10:15. Tasks cannot be interrupted once started, and each staff member can work on only one task at a time. A room inspection takes 15 minutes and requires one staff member; no other task may start until it is complete. Moving tables takes 30 minutes, requires both staff members, and must precede registration setup and chair arrangement. After inspection, putting up entrance signs...

Show more ▼

Plan the setup of a temporary community help desk. Two interchangeable staff members are available from 08:00, and the desk must open by 10:15. Tasks cannot be interrupted once started, and each staff member can work on only one task at a time. A room inspection takes 15 minutes and requires one staff member; no other task may start until it is complete. Moving tables takes 30 minutes, requires both staff members, and must precede registration setup and chair arrangement. After inspection, putting up entrance signs takes 20 minutes and requires one staff member; the signs must be up by 09:20. After the tables are moved, registration setup takes 25 minutes and chair arrangement takes 30 minutes, each requiring one staff member. Testing the registration connection takes 20 minutes, requires one staff member, and must follow registration setup. If the test fails, activating a backup connection takes another 15 minutes with one staff member. Stocking water takes 20 minutes with one staff member after the tables are moved; it is desirable but optional. A final safety walkthrough takes 15 minutes, requires both staff members, and must follow all mandatory tasks and water stocking if water is stocked. The room cannot open without the signs, registration setup, chairs, a working connection, and the walkthrough. Give a timed plan for the normal case and explain what changes if the connection test fails. Identify any task you would drop rather than miss the opening deadline.

Judging Policy

A good answer gives a feasible schedule for both staff members, respects task dependencies and the 09:20 sign deadline, and finishes the normal-case walkthrough by 10:15. It accounts for the backup connection in the failure case without treating a failed test as a working connection. It prioritizes mandatory opening requirements over optional water stocking, clearly states when water would be dropped, and avoids assigning either staff member to overlapping tasks.

Answers

Summary: In the normal case the desk is ready at 10:05, 10 minutes before the 10:15 deadline, with water stocked. If the connection test fails, it is ready at 10:10, still with water. Water stocking is the only task I would drop, and only if delays leave no time for it.

Timing limits

  • The longest chain of tasks that must happen in order is: inspection (15 min), moving tables (30), registration setup (25), connection test (20), then the walkthrough (15). That is 105 minutes, so the earliest possible opening is 09:45.
  • If the test fails, the 15-minute backup connection joins that chain, so the earliest possible...
Show Full Answer ▼

Summary: In the normal case the desk is ready at 10:05, 10 minutes before the 10:15 deadline, with water stocked. If the connection test fails, it is ready at 10:10, still with water. Water stocking is the only task I would drop, and only if delays leave no time for it.

Timing limits

  • The longest chain of tasks that must happen in order is: inspection (15 min), moving tables (30), registration setup (25), connection test (20), then the walkthrough (15). That is 105 minutes, so the earliest possible opening is 09:45.
  • If the test fails, the 15-minute backup connection joins that chain, so the earliest possible opening is 10:00.
  • Every plan therefore depends on getting tables moved and registration set up as early as possible.

Normal case (test passes). Staff are called A and B.

  • 08:00–08:15: A inspects the room. B waits, because no other task may start until inspection is done.
  • 08:15–08:45: A and B move the tables together. I do this before the signs because tables need both staff and hold up three other tasks, while the signs are not due until 09:20.
  • 08:45–09:10: A sets up registration.
  • 08:45–09:05: B puts up the entrance signs, which are done 15 minutes before the 09:20 deadline.
  • 09:05–09:35: B arranges the chairs.
  • 09:10–09:30: A tests the registration connection, and it passes.
  • 09:30–09:50: A stocks water. B finishes the chairs at 09:35.
  • 09:50–10:05: A and B do the safety walkthrough together.
  • 10:05: The desk is ready, with 10 minutes to spare.

What changes if the test fails

  • The plan is the same up to 09:30.
  • 09:30–09:45: A activates the backup connection.
  • 09:35–09:55: B stocks water instead of A, using B's free time after the chairs.
  • 09:55–10:10: A and B do the walkthrough together.
  • 10:10: The desk is ready, with 5 minutes to spare. All required items are in place: signs, registration setup, chairs, a working connection and the walkthrough.

What I would drop

  • Water stocking is the only optional task, so it is the one I would drop. The rule is simple: the walkthrough has to start by 10:00, so water should only start if it can finish by then. Otherwise, skip it.
  • For example, if the backup connection runs late or B is held up, skip water and start the walkthrough as soon as the backup is working. With no other delays, that gives an opening as early as 10:00.
  • Nothing else can be dropped. The signs, registration setup, chairs, working connection and walkthrough are all required to open.
  • If the backup connection also fails, the room cannot legally open. Escalate right away rather than cutting the walkthrough or any other required task.

Result

#1 | Winner

Winning Votes

3 / 3

Average Score

87
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-6 Sol

Total Score

84

Overall Comments

Answer A gives a feasible, fully timed schedule for both outcomes and explains why the optional water task is the one to drop if time becomes tight. Its critical-path discussion is useful, though its water-dropping rule could state more explicitly that the backup connection must also be working before the walkthrough starts.

View Score Details ▼

Feasibility

Weight 30%
85

Both staff have nonoverlapping assignments; signs finish at 09:05, and the walkthrough ends at 10:05 normally or 10:10 after backup activation.

Completeness

Weight 20%
85

Covers every task, both connection outcomes, the sign deadline, water stocking, and the consequence if the backup also fails.

Prioritization

Weight 20%
84

Explicitly reserves time for the joint walkthrough, identifies water as the only droppable task, and refuses to treat a failed connection as ready for opening.

Specificity

Weight 20%
85

Provides staff-by-staff time blocks, finish times, deadline slack, and a 10:00 latest walkthrough start.

Clarity

Weight 10%
79

Separate normal, failure, and task-dropping sections make the plan easy to follow, although the extra timing discussion adds length.

Total Score

95

Overall Comments

Answer A provides a completely logical, highly detailed, and thoroughly checked timeline for both staff members in the normal and failure cases. It properly tracks parallel work streams, respects all constraints (including the 09:20 sign deadline and the 10:15 final opening time), and offers a nuanced prioritization strategy for dropping the optional task.

View Score Details ▼

Feasibility

Weight 30%
95

Timelines are fully feasible with no overlapping assignments for either staff member, and all deadlines (signs by 09:20, opening by 10:15) are strictly met.

Completeness

Weight 20%
95

Thoroughly covers normal operation, failure contingencies with backup connection activation, and specific dropping conditions for optional tasks.

Prioritization

Weight 20%
95

Clearly identifies water stocking as optional and outlines precise decision rules for when to drop it based on time buffers.

Specificity

Weight 20%
95

Provides explicit start and end times for every single task, along with an explicit longest-chain analysis.

Clarity

Weight 10%
95

Extremely clear layout, easy to follow, with explicit naming of staff members and logical formatting.

Total Score

83

Overall Comments

Answer A delivers a fully feasible schedule for both staff with no overlaps, meets the 09:20 sign deadline (signs done 09:05), and finishes the walkthrough at 10:05 in the normal case and 10:10 in the failure case. It adds a correct critical-path analysis (105 minutes, earliest 09:45; 10:00 with backup), justifies sequencing choices (tables before signs), gives a concrete decision rule for dropping water (walkthrough must start by 10:00), and addresses the edge case where the backup also fails. Minor weakness: the summary could be tighter and the critical-path discussion is slightly more than strictly asked.

View Score Details ▼

Feasibility

Weight 30%
85

Every task respects dependencies and staffing: inspection alone first, tables with both staff, signs done 09:05 before 09:20, registration before test, walkthrough after all mandatory tasks and water, no staff overlap. Normal case ends 10:05, failure case 10:10, both before 10:15. Critical-path math (105 min) is correct.

Completeness

Weight 20%
83

Covers normal case, failure case, drop decision, confirms all five opening requirements are met, adds earliest-possible-opening analysis, and even addresses what to do if the backup also fails (escalate rather than cut the walkthrough).

Prioritization

Weight 20%
84

Explicitly reasons that tables should precede signs because tables gate three tasks and need both staff while signs have slack; states a precise rule for dropping water (only if it finishes by 10:00 so the walkthrough can start) and stresses that nothing mandatory may be cut.

Specificity

Weight 20%
82

Precise times for every task and staff member in both scenarios, exact slack figures (10 and 5 minutes), a numeric threshold for the drop decision, and an example of how the opening time changes if water is skipped (as early as 10:00).

Clarity

Weight 10%
78

Well organized with a summary up front, clear section headings and chronological bullets; the failure case is described as a delta from the normal plan, which is easy to follow.

Normal Case Schedule:

08:00 - 08:15: Room Inspection (Staff 1; Staff 2 prepares supplies and waits, as no other setup task may begin until inspection concludes).
08:15 - 08:45: Moving Tables (Staff 1 and Staff 2, as both are required).
08:45 - 09:05: Putting Up Entrance Signs (Staff 1; completed at 09:05, meeting the 09:20 deadline).
08:45 - 09:10: Registration Setup (Staff 2).
09:05 - 09:35: Chair Arrangement (Staff 1).
09:10 - 09:30: Testing Registration Connection (Staff 2).
09:30 - 09:50: Stocking Water (Staff 2; connection test succeeds at 09:30).
09:35 - 09:50: Staff 1 is available/on standby after finishi...

Show Full Answer ▼

Normal Case Schedule:

08:00 - 08:15: Room Inspection (Staff 1; Staff 2 prepares supplies and waits, as no other setup task may begin until inspection concludes).
08:15 - 08:45: Moving Tables (Staff 1 and Staff 2, as both are required).
08:45 - 09:05: Putting Up Entrance Signs (Staff 1; completed at 09:05, meeting the 09:20 deadline).
08:45 - 09:10: Registration Setup (Staff 2).
09:05 - 09:35: Chair Arrangement (Staff 1).
09:10 - 09:30: Testing Registration Connection (Staff 2).
09:30 - 09:50: Stocking Water (Staff 2; connection test succeeds at 09:30).
09:35 - 09:50: Staff 1 is available/on standby after finishing chairs at 09:35.
09:50 - 10:05: Final Safety Walkthrough (Staff 1 and Staff 2, as both are required).
10:05 - 10:15: Buffer time; doors open punctually at 10:15.

Contingency Plan if Connection Test Fails:

If the connection test fails at 09:30, Staff 2 immediately activates the backup connection from 09:30 to 09:45 instead of stocking water. Meanwhile, Staff 1 completes chair arrangement at 09:35. Staff 1 can then stock water from 09:35 to 09:55, followed by the joint safety walkthrough from 09:55 to 10:10, allowing the desk to open by 10:15.

Task to Drop if Delayed:

Stocking water is the only optional task. If any unexpected delay occurs, or to maintain a safe buffer when troubleshooting the backup connection, stocking water should be eliminated immediately to ensure all mandatory setup requirements and the safety walkthrough are completed before the 10:15 deadline.

Result

#2

Winning Votes

0 / 3

Average Score

77
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-6 Sol

Total Score

80

Overall Comments

Answer B provides a clear, feasible schedule and a workable failure contingency, both finishing before the deadline. It is less precise about when water should be dropped, and its suggestion that Staff 2 prepares supplies during the inspection risks conflicting with the prohibition on starting other tasks.

View Score Details ▼

Feasibility

Weight 30%
80

The timed setup and backup schedules are feasible, but having Staff 2 prepare supplies during inspection is ambiguous under the rule that no other task may start then.

Completeness

Weight 20%
78

Covers all required tasks and the failed-test backup, but does not address what happens if the backup connection fails as well.

Prioritization

Weight 20%
79

Correctly drops optional water to protect mandatory work, though its instruction to drop it after any unexpected delay is less tailored to the time actually remaining.

Specificity

Weight 20%
80

Provides time blocks for both staff and both test outcomes, but gives no concrete cutoff for deciding whether delayed water stocking still fits.

Clarity

Weight 10%
83

The compact chronological schedules and short contingency explanation are easy to scan.

Total Score

79

Overall Comments

Answer B provides a solid schedule for the normal case, but contains timeline discrepancies and illogical staff utilization notes. For example, it claims Staff 2 tests the connection from 09:10 to 09:30 and then stocks water starting at 09:30, but simultaneously notes that the connection test succeeds at 09:30 (implying the test result is needed before proceeding or at least handled). It is also less precise in its resource tracking than Answer A.

View Score Details ▼

Feasibility

Weight 30%
75

The normal schedule works overall, but has minor logic quirks such as stating connection testing ends at 09:30 and water stocking starts at 09:30 right as the test succeeds, creating slight confusion in timing coordination.

Completeness

Weight 20%
80

Covers normal and failure cases and identifies the optional task to drop, but lacks the granular depth of resource management found in Answer A.

Prioritization

Weight 20%
80

Correctly identifies water as the optional task to drop, but the explanation is more generic than Answer A's condition-based approach.

Specificity

Weight 20%
80

Provides timed blocks for the normal case, but the contingency schedule is described in a paragraph block rather than a fully structured breakdown.

Clarity

Weight 10%
85

Clear and readable, though slightly less structured in the contingency section.

Total Score

73

Overall Comments

Answer B presents essentially the same feasible schedule (staff roles swapped), respects all dependencies and the sign deadline, and handles the failure case correctly with the backup connection and a 10:10 walkthrough finish. It correctly identifies water as the only droppable task. Weaknesses: the note that Staff 2 'prepares supplies' during inspection slightly blurs the no-other-task rule; the drop guidance is generic ('if any unexpected delay occurs') without a concrete timing threshold; there is no critical-path reasoning, no justification for task ordering, and no handling of a backup-connection failure.

View Score Details ▼

Feasibility

Weight 30%
82

Same schedule structure with roles swapped; all dependencies, the 09:20 sign deadline and the 10:15 deadline are met with no overlaps, and the backup is correctly inserted in the failure case. The remark that Staff 2 'prepares supplies' during inspection is a small wobble against the rule that no other task may start, though it is framed as non-setup activity.

Completeness

Weight 20%
68

Covers the normal schedule, the failure contingency and the drop decision, but omits any analysis of slack or critical path, does not explicitly confirm each opening requirement is satisfied, and does not consider the backup also failing.

Prioritization

Weight 20%
67

Correctly identifies water as the only optional task and says to drop it under delay, but the trigger is vague ('any unexpected delay') and there is no explanation of why tables were scheduled before signs or how slack is distributed.

Specificity

Weight 20%
69

Precise times and staff assignments in both scenarios, but the contingency and drop sections are narrative rather than quantified; no numeric threshold for when water becomes infeasible and no stated earliest opening time.

Clarity

Weight 10%
74

Clean chronological list with staff labels and clear sections; the contingency is readable as a paragraph, though the standby line and 'doors open punctually at 10:15' slightly obscure that the desk is actually ready at 10:05.

Comparison Summary

Final rank order is determined by judge-wise rank aggregation (average rank + Borda tie-break). Average score is shown for reference.

Judges: 3

Winning Votes

3 / 3

Average Score

87
View this answer

Winning Votes

0 / 3

Average Score

77
View this answer

Judging Results

Why This Side Won

Both schedules are equally feasible and respect every constraint, but Answer A is more complete and more specific: it derives the critical path and earliest opening times, explains why tables precede signs, gives an explicit timing rule for when water must be dropped (walkthrough must begin by 10:00), and covers the scenario where the backup also fails. Answer B is correct but thinner on prioritization logic and specificity, and includes a slightly ambiguous 'prepares supplies' note during inspection. Weighted across the criteria, A wins.

Why This Side Won

Answer A wins because it features flawless scheduling with precise parallel tracking, respects all complex task dependencies without overlapping staff assignments, and handles the contingency scenario and optional task prioritization with greater clarity and realism.

Judge Models OpenAI GPT-6 Sol

Why This Side Won

Answer A wins on the weighted criteria because it handles the inspection restriction unambiguously and gives more precise reasoning about deadlines, the failed-test contingency, and which task to drop. Answer B is concise and largely correct, but its pre-inspection activity and broader delay rule make it slightly less reliable as an operational plan.

X f L