Orivel Orivel
Open menu

Announcing a Return-to-Office Policy Change

Compare model answers for this Business Writing benchmark and review scores, judging comments, and related examples.

Login or register to use likes and favorites. Register

X f L

Contents

Task Overview

Benchmark Genres

Business Writing

Task Creator Model

Answering Models

Judge Models

Task Prompt

You are the Director of People Operations at a 400-person software company called Northwind Analytics. For the past two years employees have worked fully remotely. Starting in three months, the company will move to a hybrid model requiring all employees to work from the office at least three days per week (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday).

Write a company-wide email announcing this change. The email must:

  • Have a clear subject line and an appropriate greeting and sign-off (sign as Jordan Reyes, Director of Peopl...
Show more

You are the Director of People Operations at a 400-person software company called Northwind Analytics. For the past two years employees have worked fully remotely. Starting in three months, the company will move to a hybrid model requiring all employees to work from the office at least three days per week (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday).

Write a company-wide email announcing this change. The email must:

  • Have a clear subject line and an appropriate greeting and sign-off (sign as Jordan Reyes, Director of People Operations).
  • Explain the new policy in specific terms: which days, when it starts, and who it applies to.
  • Give at least two honest, credible business reasons for the change without being dismissive of remote work.
  • Acknowledge that some employees will find this difficult and briefly address likely concerns (commuting, childcare, focus time).
  • Mention at least two concrete support measures the company will offer (for example, a commuter stipend, flexible daily hours, or updated office spaces).
  • Explain what employees should do next and where to direct questions.
  • Stay professional, warm, and concise, and be suitable for a general employee audience.

Keep the email between roughly 300 and 450 words. Do not invent legally binding commitments beyond what a reasonable HR announcement would include.

Judging Policy

A strong answer reads like a polished, real company announcement email that an HR director could send with minimal editing. It should include a specific, informative subject line, appropriate greeting, and a sign-off attributed to the named sender. The policy details must be unambiguous: the three required in-office days (Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday), the start date framed as roughly three months out, and the scope (all employees). The message should provide at least two credible business reasons that respect remo...

Show more

A strong answer reads like a polished, real company announcement email that an HR director could send with minimal editing. It should include a specific, informative subject line, appropriate greeting, and a sign-off attributed to the named sender. The policy details must be unambiguous: the three required in-office days (Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday), the start date framed as roughly three months out, and the scope (all employees). The message should provide at least two credible business reasons that respect remote work rather than disparaging it, and it should empathetically acknowledge realistic employee concerns such as commuting, childcare, and focus time. It should name at least two concrete support measures and give clear next steps plus a point of contact for questions. Tone should be professional, warm, and concise, avoiding corporate jargon, defensiveness, or vague filler. Structure should flow logically from announcement to rationale to support to next steps. Penalize answers that ignore stated constraints, invent implausible or legally risky promises, are dismissive of employees, drift far outside the word range, or bury the key policy details.

Answers

Subject: Moving to a Three-Day Hybrid Work Schedule

Hello Northwind team,

After two years of fully remote work, Northwind Analytics will transition to a hybrid work model beginning three months from today. At that time, all employees will be expected to work from the office every Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Mondays and Fridays will remain available for remote work. This policy applies company-wide across teams, roles, and levels, unless an individual has an approved workplace accommodation or other arrangement through People Operations.

Remote work has enabled us to remain productive, serve our customers...

Show Full Answer

Subject: Moving to a Three-Day Hybrid Work Schedule

Hello Northwind team,

After two years of fully remote work, Northwind Analytics will transition to a hybrid work model beginning three months from today. At that time, all employees will be expected to work from the office every Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Mondays and Fridays will remain available for remote work. This policy applies company-wide across teams, roles, and levels, unless an individual has an approved workplace accommodation or other arrangement through People Operations.

Remote work has enabled us to remain productive, serve our customers, and grow our team, and we recognize the flexibility and focus it can provide. At the same time, employee feedback and our operating experience have shown that some activities are more effective when we are together. In particular, cross-functional planning, complex problem-solving, onboarding, and mentoring benefit from faster, in-person collaboration. A shared office schedule will also help teams coordinate more predictably and strengthen the relationships that support effective work across the company.

We understand that this will be a significant adjustment for some employees. Commuting and childcare arrangements may require advance planning, and many people are understandably concerned about protecting uninterrupted focus time. We are providing three months’ notice so everyone has time to prepare, and we ask managers to schedule thoughtfully and preserve focus blocks where possible.

To support the transition, Northwind will:

• Provide a monthly commuter stipend for employees traveling to the office.
• Allow flexible arrival and departure times on office days, with teams coordinating shared collaboration hours.
• Update office spaces with additional quiet rooms, focus areas, and improved video-conferencing equipment.

Within the next week, People Operations will publish detailed guidance on the company intranet, including the effective date, stipend process, office access, and answers to common questions. Managers will also discuss team-specific schedules and working norms during upcoming team meetings.

Please review the guidance when it is posted and begin planning for the transition. If you have questions, personal circumstances that may require support, or a request related to a workplace accommodation, contact People Operations at people@northwindanalytics.com. Managers may also send policy questions through the People Operations help desk.

Thank you for approaching this change with openness and care for one another.

Best,

Jordan Reyes
Director of People Operations

Result

#1 | Winner

Winning Votes

3 / 3

Average Score

88
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.5

Total Score

91

Overall Comments

Answer A is a polished, realistic HR announcement that meets nearly all requirements. It clearly states the hybrid policy, timing, required days, scope, rationale, employee concerns, support measures, and next steps. Its tone is warm and respectful of remote work, and it avoids overpromising while giving practical guidance.

View Score Details

Appropriateness

Weight 25%
90

Answer A is highly appropriate for a company-wide HR announcement. It includes the required subject, greeting, sign-off, policy details, credible reasons, empathy, support measures, and avoids legally risky promises.

Clarity

Weight 20%
92

Answer A states the policy very clearly: all employees, Tuesday through Thursday in office, Mondays and Fridays remote, starting three months from today, with exceptions only through approved arrangements.

Structure

Weight 20%
90

Answer A flows logically from announcement to rationale, employee impact, support measures, next steps, and contact information. The bullet list makes the support measures easy to scan.

Actionability

Weight 20%
93

Answer A gives strong next steps: employees should review forthcoming intranet guidance, managers will discuss team norms, and questions or accommodation-related concerns should go to People Operations with a specific email address.

Tone

Weight 15%
91

Answer A is warm, professional, and empathetic. It explicitly respects the value of remote work while explaining the business rationale without sounding defensive or dismissive.

Total Score

82

Overall Comments

Answer A reads like a polished, ready-to-send HR announcement. It nails every constraint: a clear informative subject line, warm greeting, and correctly attributed sign-off. Policy details are unambiguous—Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday, "three months from today" as the start, and company-wide scope with a sensible carve-out for accommodations. It gives multiple credible business reasons (cross-functional planning, complex problem-solving, onboarding, mentoring) while explicitly respecting the value of remote work. It empathetically addresses all three named concerns (commuting, childcare, focus time), lists three concrete support measures (commuter stipend, flexible hours, updated office spaces), and provides specific next steps plus a clear contact channel. The tone is professional, warm, and concise, and it sits comfortably within the word range. Only minor nitpick: it does not pin an exact calendar date, but "three months from today" is fully consistent with the prompt's framing.

View Score Details

Appropriateness

Weight 25%
85

Meets every prompt constraint precisely: correct days, three-months framing, company-wide scope with accommodation note, two-plus credible reasons that respect remote work, all three concerns addressed, three support measures, next steps and contact. Stays within word range and invents no legally risky promises.

Clarity

Weight 20%
85

Policy details are stated unambiguously in the opening: exact days, remote days, start timing, and scope. Reasons and support measures are crisply enumerated with no filler.

Structure

Weight 20%
80

Logical flow from announcement to rationale to concerns to support to next steps to contact, with a clean bulleted support list and a strong closing.

Actionability

Weight 20%
80

Gives concrete next steps (intranet guidance within a week, manager discussions), a clear email contact, and a separate manager help-desk channel, plus specific support mechanisms.

Tone

Weight 15%
80

Professional, warm, and empathetic without defensiveness or jargon; the closing thanks employees for care for one another, striking a genuine note.

Total Score

91

Overall Comments

Answer A is an excellent example of a well-crafted corporate communication. It directly and clearly addresses every component of the prompt, from the specific policy details to the empathetic acknowledgement of employee concerns. Its structure is logical, its tone is a perfect blend of professional and warm, and its next steps are concrete and actionable. The use of a bulleted list for support measures enhances readability.

View Score Details

Appropriateness

Weight 25%
90

The email reads like a real, polished HR announcement. The subject line is direct, the content is suitable, and the inclusion of a clause for workplace accommodations adds a layer of professional realism.

Clarity

Weight 20%
95

The policy is explained with exceptional clarity. It uses the prompt's relative timeline ("three months from today") and is very specific about the support measures, such as "flexible arrival and departure times."

Structure

Weight 20%
90

The email has an excellent, logical structure. It flows from the announcement to the rationale, then to support and next steps. The use of a bulleted list for support measures makes that section easy to scan.

Actionability

Weight 20%
90

The next steps are highly actionable. It provides a specific timeline ("Within the next week") and a clear deliverable (detailed guidance on the intranet), telling employees exactly what to expect and when.

Tone

Weight 15%
90

The tone is a perfect balance of professional, warm, and direct. It avoids corporate jargon and ends with a particularly empathetic closing statement that fosters goodwill.

Subject: Important Update: Transitioning to a Hybrid Work Model at Northwind Analytics

Dear Northwind Analytics Team,

I am writing to share an important update regarding our work model. After careful consideration and extensive discussion, Northwind Analytics will be transitioning to a hybrid work model, effective Monday, October 2nd.

This new policy will require all employees to work from our office a minimum of three days per week. The designated in-office days will be Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. We believe this structured approach will foster a more collaborative and innovative environment while st...

Show Full Answer

Subject: Important Update: Transitioning to a Hybrid Work Model at Northwind Analytics

Dear Northwind Analytics Team,

I am writing to share an important update regarding our work model. After careful consideration and extensive discussion, Northwind Analytics will be transitioning to a hybrid work model, effective Monday, October 2nd.

This new policy will require all employees to work from our office a minimum of three days per week. The designated in-office days will be Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. We believe this structured approach will foster a more collaborative and innovative environment while still offering flexibility.

This decision was made after two years of successful remote operations. We recognize the many benefits remote work has provided, including increased flexibility and autonomy. However, as we look to the future, we believe a hybrid model will best support our long-term goals. Specifically, we aim to enhance cross-functional collaboration and spontaneous idea generation that often thrives in shared physical spaces. Additionally, we believe in-person interaction is crucial for mentorship, team cohesion, and onboarding new team members, strengthening our company culture.

We understand that this transition may present challenges for some, and we want to acknowledge that. Concerns about commuting, childcare arrangements, and maintaining focus during in-office days are valid. We are committed to supporting you through this change.

To help ease this transition, Northwind Analytics will be implementing the following support measures:

  1. Commuter Stipend: A monthly stipend will be provided to all employees to help offset commuting costs.
  2. Office Enhancements: We are investing in updating our office spaces to ensure they are conducive to focused work and collaboration, including quiet zones and improved meeting room technology.

We will also be reviewing daily schedules to offer greater flexibility where possible within the hybrid framework.

In the coming weeks, your direct managers will reach out to discuss team-specific implementation details. We will also be hosting Q&A sessions to address any questions you may have. Please look out for further communications regarding these sessions.

In the meantime, if you have immediate questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to the People Operations team at peopleops@northwindanalytics.com.

Thank you for your continued dedication and adaptability as we navigate this next chapter together.

Sincerely,
Jordan Reyes
Director of People Operations

Result

#2

Winning Votes

0 / 3

Average Score

78
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.5

Total Score

81

Overall Comments

Answer B is a strong and professional announcement with the required days, scope, rationale, concerns, support measures, and next steps. However, it invents a specific effective date that is not tied to the prompt’s three-month timeline, is slightly more generic in places, and provides somewhat less precise implementation guidance than Answer A.

View Score Details

Appropriateness

Weight 25%
80

Answer B is appropriate and covers most required elements, but the specific October 2 effective date is invented and may not match the required three-month timeline. It is otherwise suitable for a general employee audience.

Clarity

Weight 20%
81

Answer B clearly names Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday and says all employees are covered, but the effective date is not anchored to the prompt’s timing. The phrase 'minimum of three days' could also leave slightly more ambiguity about whether additional office days may be required.

Structure

Weight 20%
82

Answer B has a logical email structure and readable paragraphs, with a numbered list for support measures. It is somewhat more generic and less tightly organized around implementation details than Answer A.

Actionability

Weight 20%
78

Answer B provides reasonable next steps through manager follow-up, Q&A sessions, and a People Operations email address. However, it is less specific about timing, where detailed guidance will live, and how employees should prepare.

Tone

Weight 15%
84

Answer B is professional and respectful, and it acknowledges employee concerns. Its tone is somewhat more standard corporate announcement language, but still appropriate and considerate.

Total Score

72

Overall Comments

Answer B is a solid, professional announcement covering most requirements: clear subject, appropriate greeting and sign-off, the correct three in-office days, credible business reasons that respect remote work, acknowledgment of commuting/childcare/focus concerns, and two-plus support measures with next steps and a contact. However, it introduces a specific date, "Monday, October 2nd," which is a risky invention not anchored to "three months out" and could easily be inaccurate; it also slightly weakens the "roughly three months' notice" framing. The Markdown formatting (asterisks/bold) is inappropriate for a plain company email and would need editing before sending. Support measures are somewhat less concrete (flexible scheduling is hedged as "reviewing"). Overall competent but marginally less airtight than A on specificity and send-readiness.

View Score Details

Appropriateness

Weight 25%
65

Covers most requirements but invents a specific date ('Monday, October 2nd') not anchored to the three-months framing, a small overreach that could be inaccurate. Also uses Markdown formatting inappropriate for a plain email, and one support measure is hedged as under review rather than committed.

Clarity

Weight 20%
70

Clear and readable, but splits the days and 'minimum three days' across two paragraphs, slightly less front-loaded. The bold Markdown and the reviewing-schedules aside add mild noise.

Structure

Weight 20%
75

Well-organized with a similar logical arc and a numbered support list, though the flexible-hours measure is tucked in as an afterthought after the list, slightly muddying the structure.

Actionability

Weight 20%
75

Provides next steps (manager outreach, Q&A sessions) and a contact email, but is a bit vaguer on timing and the stipend/flex details are less specified than A's.

Tone

Weight 15%
75

Warm and professional overall, though phrases like 'this next chapter' and 'spontaneous idea generation' lean slightly toward corporate cliché.

Total Score

83

Overall Comments

Answer B is a strong and competent response that successfully fulfills most of the task requirements. It clearly states the new policy, provides credible reasons, and acknowledges employee concerns. However, it is slightly weaker than Answer A in its actionability, offering vaguer timelines for next steps ("in the coming weeks") and less concrete commitments for support (e.g., "reviewing daily schedules to offer greater flexibility where possible").

View Score Details

Appropriateness

Weight 25%
85

The email is highly appropriate for the context. The subject line is a bit more generic with "Important Update," but the overall content and format are professional and well-suited for a company-wide announcement.

Clarity

Weight 20%
85

The core policy is explained clearly. However, using a specific date ("October 2nd") deviates slightly from the prompt's relative timeline. The commitment to flexible hours is also phrased more vaguely than in Answer A.

Structure

Weight 20%
88

The structure is very good and follows a logical progression. The use of a numbered list for support measures is effective, though slightly less scannable than the bullet points in Answer A.

Actionability

Weight 20%
75

The next steps are somewhat vague. Timelines like "In the coming weeks" and instructions to "look out for further communications" are less concrete and actionable for employees than the specifics provided in Answer A.

Tone

Weight 15%
80

The tone is professional and appropriate. It's slightly more formal and less direct than Answer A, starting with the phrase "I am writing to share an important update," which is a minor weakness.

Comparison Summary

Final rank order is determined by judge-wise rank aggregation (average rank + Borda tie-break). Average score is shown for reference.

Judges: 3

Winning Votes

3 / 3

Average Score

88
View this answer

Winning Votes

0 / 3

Average Score

78
View this answer

Judging Results

Why This Side Won

Answer A is the winner because it is more precise, actionable, and polished. It adheres more closely to the prompt's details (e.g., the "three months from now" timeline) and provides clearer, more concrete next steps for employees, such as the promise of detailed guidance on the intranet "within the next week." This level of specificity makes it a more effective and reassuring piece of communication.

Why This Side Won

Answer A wins on the most heavily weighted criteria—appropriateness (25) and clarity (20)—and ties or edges B on the rest. A satisfies every stated constraint precisely: it frames the start as "three months from today" (matching the prompt exactly), clarifies scope with an accommodation carve-out, respects remote work, addresses all three named concerns, and lists three concrete support measures. B invents a specific calendar date ("October 2nd") that is not grounded in the prompt and risks inaccuracy, and it uses Markdown bold/asterisks unsuitable for a real company email, requiring more editing before sending. On the weighted result, A's stronger appropriateness and clarity carry the decision.

Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.5

Why This Side Won

Answer A wins because it more fully and precisely satisfies the task requirements across the most important criteria. It handles the three-month timing without inventing an unsupported calendar date, gives clearer next steps, names more concrete support measures, and balances business rationale with employee empathy more effectively. Answer B is good, but its invented date and slightly less specific action guidance make it weaker overall.

X f L