Orivel Orivel
Open menu

Persuade a School Board to Keep the Arts Program

Compare model answers for this Persuasion benchmark and review scores, judging comments, and related examples.

Login or register to use likes and favorites. Register

X f L

Contents

Task Overview

Benchmark Genres

Persuasion

Task Creator Model

Answering Models

Judge Models

Task Prompt

You are a parent representative at a public middle school. The school board has proposed cutting the entire arts program (visual arts, music, and drama) to redirect funds toward expanding standardized test preparation courses. You have been given five minutes to address the board at their next meeting. Write a persuasive speech (400–600 words) aimed at the school board members to convince them to preserve the arts program. Your speech must: 1. Acknowledge the board's concern about improving test scores and treat...

Show more

You are a parent representative at a public middle school. The school board has proposed cutting the entire arts program (visual arts, music, and drama) to redirect funds toward expanding standardized test preparation courses. You have been given five minutes to address the board at their next meeting. Write a persuasive speech (400–600 words) aimed at the school board members to convince them to preserve the arts program. Your speech must: 1. Acknowledge the board's concern about improving test scores and treat it as a legitimate goal. 2. Present at least three distinct arguments for keeping the arts program, drawing on educational, social-emotional, and community-based reasoning. 3. Reference at least one specific, plausible piece of evidence or research finding (e.g., a study, statistic, or documented outcome) to support your case. 4. Propose a constructive compromise that addresses the board's budget concerns without fully eliminating the arts. 5. Use a respectful, collaborative tone throughout — avoid hostility or condescension toward the board. Your speech should be structured with a clear opening, body, and closing, and should feel natural when read aloud.

Judging Policy

A strong response should be evaluated on the following dimensions. First, argument quality: the speech should present at least three clearly distinct and well-developed arguments spanning educational benefits, social-emotional development, and community impact. Second, evidence use: the response should include at least one specific, plausible piece of evidence or research reference that strengthens the case, not just vague claims. Third, rhetorical skill: the speech should have a compelling opening, logical flow, e...

Show more

A strong response should be evaluated on the following dimensions. First, argument quality: the speech should present at least three clearly distinct and well-developed arguments spanning educational benefits, social-emotional development, and community impact. Second, evidence use: the response should include at least one specific, plausible piece of evidence or research reference that strengthens the case, not just vague claims. Third, rhetorical skill: the speech should have a compelling opening, logical flow, effective transitions, and a memorable closing that would resonate with a school board audience. Fourth, tone and audience awareness: the speech must acknowledge the board's legitimate concerns about test scores and budgets, remain respectful and collaborative, and avoid strawmanning or dismissiveness. Fifth, compromise proposal: the response should offer a realistic, constructive alternative that partially addresses budget concerns while preserving the arts in some form. Sixth, constraint adherence: the speech should fall within the 400–600 word range and feel natural when read aloud. Responses that are generic, fail to meet the specific constraints, rely on clichés without substantive reasoning, or adopt an adversarial tone should be rated lower.

Answers

Good evening, President [Board President's Last Name], esteemed members of the School Board, and fellow community members. My name is [Your Name], and I am here tonight as a parent representative to discuss the proposed elimination of our middle school's arts program – visual arts, music, and drama.I want to begin by acknowledging the board's dedication to our students' academic success. We all share the legitimate goal of improving test scores and ensuring our students are well-prepared for high school and beyond. The desire to expand standardized test preparation courses is understandable, given the pressures a...

Show Full Answer

Good evening, President [Board President's Last Name], esteemed members of the School Board, and fellow community members. My name is [Your Name], and I am here tonight as a parent representative to discuss the proposed elimination of our middle school's arts program – visual arts, music, and drama.I want to begin by acknowledging the board's dedication to our students' academic success. We all share the legitimate goal of improving test scores and ensuring our students are well-prepared for high school and beyond. The desire to expand standardized test preparation courses is understandable, given the pressures and metrics we face. However, I firmly believe that cutting the arts program is not only a short-sighted solution but one that will ultimately undermine the very academic success we seek to achieve.Firstly, let's consider the profound educational benefits that the arts provide, benefits that extend far beyond what a standardized test can measure. Arts education is not a luxury; it is a fundamental component of a well-rounded education that enhances cognitive development. When students engage in music, they develop mathematical reasoning and pattern recognition. When they participate in drama, they hone their literacy, public speaking, and critical thinking skills. Visual arts foster problem-solving, observation, and creative innovation. These are not isolated skills; they are transferable assets that strengthen performance across all academic subjects. Indeed, research consistently demonstrates this connection. For instance, The College Board itself has noted that students who take four years of arts and music classes score an average of 100 points higher on the SAT than those who take only one-half year or less. This isn't just about test prep; it's about building a stronger foundation for learning.Secondly, the arts are absolutely vital for our students' social-emotional development. Middle school is a critical period for identity formation, and the arts offer a unique and safe outlet for self-expression, emotional processing, and building self-esteem. They teach collaboration, empathy, and resilience – skills that are increasingly recognized as crucial for success in life and in the modern workforce. A student struggling with traditional academics might find their voice and confidence on stage, or through a paintbrush, leading to increased engagement across the board. These programs provide a sense of belonging and purpose, reducing stress and fostering a positive school climate where students feel valued and connected.Finally, preserving our arts program is essential for strengthening our school community and culture. Arts events – concerts, plays, art shows – are vibrant expressions of our students' talents and a source of immense pride for families and the wider community. They create opportunities for connection, bringing parents, teachers, and local residents together to celebrate our students' achievements. A school with a thriving arts program is a more engaging, dynamic, and attractive place for students and families, contributing to a positive reputation and fostering a sense of collective identity. Eliminating these programs would diminish the richness of our school experience and sever important ties with our community.I understand the financial constraints and the need for difficult decisions. Instead of a complete elimination, I urge the board to consider a constructive compromise. Perhaps we could explore a phased approach, maintaining a core arts curriculum while seeking grant funding or community partnerships to support advanced electives. We could also integrate arts more intentionally into other subjects, demonstrating their interdisciplinary value. Let's look into reducing administrative overhead or exploring shared resources, rather than cutting a program that offers such profound, irreplaceable benefits.In closing, I ask you to consider the long-term vision for our students. A truly excellent education prepares students not just for tests, but for life – equipping them with creativity, critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and a sense of belonging. The arts are not an optional extra; they are integral to developing well-rounded, resilient, and engaged citizens. Let us work together to find a solution that supports both academic rigor and the holistic development of every child. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.

Result

#2

Winning Votes

0 / 3

Average Score

77
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.2

Total Score

75

Overall Comments

Answer A meets all key constraints and provides three distinct arguments (academic transfer benefits, social-emotional growth, and community/culture). It includes a specific evidence claim (College Board/SAT arts correlation) and proposes a compromise (phased approach, grants/partnerships, integration). However, the evidence is less tailored to a middle-school board decision (SAT/four years is more high-school framed and correlation-based), and the compromise suggestions feel a bit generic and less operationally concrete. Some phrasing is slightly formal and dense for a 5-minute oral delivery (a few long paragraphs and broad claims).

View Score Details

Persuasiveness

Weight 35%
73

Compelling case with clear tri-part arguments and a strong concluding appeal, but some claims are broad and the SAT-based evidence feels less immediate for a middle-school funding debate, slightly weakening impact.

Logic

Weight 20%
70

Reasoning is coherent and well ordered, but the key statistic is correlational and not tightly matched to the setting (SAT/four years), and the budget alternative is somewhat non-specific.

Audience Fit

Weight 20%
76

Respectful and acknowledges test-score pressures; however, the formality and references (e.g., SAT) are slightly less tuned to a middle-school board’s immediate metrics and constraints.

Clarity

Weight 15%
72

Organized with clear signposting, but some long sentences and dense paragraphs reduce oral readability within a 5-minute delivery.

Ethics & Safety

Weight 10%
95

Respectful, collaborative, and non-hostile; no safety or ethics issues.

Total Score

89

Overall Comments

Answer A is an excellent response that fully meets all the requirements of the prompt. It is well-structured, uses a respectful tone, and presents three distinct, well-reasoned arguments. The inclusion of a specific statistic from The College Board is a strong piece of evidence that directly addresses the board's focus on test scores. The proposed compromises are sensible. The speech is persuasive and logically sound, making a compelling case for the arts program.

View Score Details

Persuasiveness

Weight 35%
85

The speech is highly persuasive. It uses a strong, logical structure and a compelling piece of evidence (the SAT score statistic) that directly counters the board's rationale. The arguments are well-developed and emotionally resonant.

Logic

Weight 20%
90

The speech is perfectly logical. It uses clear signposting ("Firstly," "Secondly," "Finally") to structure its three distinct arguments, which flow coherently from educational to social-emotional to community benefits. The conclusion logically follows from the premises.

Audience Fit

Weight 20%
85

The tone is perfectly suited for a school board meeting—respectful, collaborative, and serious. The use of a College Board statistic shows a keen awareness of what this specific audience values (metrics, academic achievement).

Clarity

Weight 15%
95

The speech is exceptionally clear and well-written. The language is precise, the sentences are well-constructed, and the overall message is easy to follow and understand. The structure contributes significantly to its clarity.

Ethics & Safety

Weight 10%
100

The response is ethically sound and perfectly safe. It advocates for students' well-being in a constructive and respectful manner, adhering to all ethical guidelines for civil discourse.

Total Score

68

Overall Comments

Answer A delivers a well-structured speech that covers all required elements: it acknowledges the board's concerns, presents three distinct arguments (educational, social-emotional, community), references the College Board SAT statistic, proposes a compromise, and maintains a respectful tone. However, it exceeds the 600-word limit (approximately 620+ words), which is a constraint violation. The tone, while respectful, occasionally edges toward lecturing ("I firmly believe that cutting the arts program is not only a short-sighted solution"). The compromise section is somewhat vague, listing several ideas without much specificity. The speech uses bracket placeholders which slightly undermine the natural read-aloud quality. The SAT statistic is a well-known and plausible reference. Overall, it is a solid response but has some weaknesses in constraint adherence and rhetorical finesse.

View Score Details

Persuasiveness

Weight 35%
68

Answer A presents compelling arguments and uses the SAT statistic effectively. However, phrases like 'short-sighted solution' and 'I firmly believe' slightly undermine the collaborative framing. The compromise section is vague, weakening the overall persuasive impact. The bracket placeholders also reduce the speech's immediacy.

Logic

Weight 20%
70

The three arguments are clearly distinct and logically structured. The SAT statistic from the College Board is specific and well-integrated. The logical progression from educational to social-emotional to community reasoning is sound. However, some claims are somewhat broad without deep development.

Audience Fit

Weight 20%
65

The speech acknowledges the board's concerns at the opening, which is appropriate. However, the tone occasionally shifts toward lecturing ('The arts are not an optional extra'). The bracket placeholders reduce the sense of a real, delivered speech. The compromise section could be more tailored to a budget-conscious board.

Clarity

Weight 15%
68

The speech is clearly organized with distinct sections. However, some sentences are quite long and dense, which could reduce clarity when read aloud. The paragraph structure is somewhat wall-of-text in presentation. Transitions between arguments are adequate but could be smoother.

Ethics & Safety

Weight 10%
70

The speech is ethically sound, treating the board's position with respect and avoiding manipulation or fear-mongering. It advocates for students' wellbeing through legitimate argumentation. No ethical concerns.

Good evening, members of the board, administrators, and fellow parents. Thank you for the opportunity to speak tonight. I want to begin by acknowledging something important: your concern about improving test scores is real, reasonable, and urgent. We all want our students to read more confidently, write more clearly, and succeed academically. No parent here is against stronger academic outcomes. But I respectfully urge you not to solve that problem by eliminating the arts program. Cutting visual arts, music, and drama may seem like a straightforward budget decision, but it would cost our students far more than i...

Show Full Answer

Good evening, members of the board, administrators, and fellow parents. Thank you for the opportunity to speak tonight. I want to begin by acknowledging something important: your concern about improving test scores is real, reasonable, and urgent. We all want our students to read more confidently, write more clearly, and succeed academically. No parent here is against stronger academic outcomes. But I respectfully urge you not to solve that problem by eliminating the arts program. Cutting visual arts, music, and drama may seem like a straightforward budget decision, but it would cost our students far more than it saves. First, the arts support academic achievement rather than compete with it. Study after study has shown that students who participate in the arts often demonstrate stronger attendance, greater engagement, and improved performance in core subjects. For example, a large report from the Arts Education Partnership and the President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities highlighted that low-income students with high arts participation were more likely to have higher grades and college aspirations than their peers with little arts involvement. The arts build skills that testing also measures: focus, pattern recognition, interpretation, persistence, and creative problem-solving. If our goal is better student performance, removing one of the very programs that keeps students engaged in school is a risky strategy. Second, the arts are essential to students’ social and emotional development. Middle school is a challenging time. Students are figuring out who they are, how to manage stress, and where they belong. For many children, the art room, the band room, or the stage is the place where they first feel seen and successful. Not every child shines through a multiple-choice exam. Some gain confidence by performing in a play, expressing emotion through painting, or learning discipline in ensemble music. These experiences build resilience, self-control, empathy, and collaboration—qualities that matter in classrooms, in future workplaces, and in life. Third, the arts strengthen school culture and community connection. Arts programs bring families into the building for concerts, exhibits, and performances. They create pride in the school and give students public opportunities to contribute something meaningful. When communities see children create, perform, and grow, they invest more deeply in their schools. Eliminating the arts would not just remove classes; it would diminish the sense of identity and belonging that makes a school feel alive. I also understand the board’s budget constraints. So I am not here simply to say no. I am here to suggest a compromise. Instead of eliminating the arts entirely, consider preserving a reduced but protected arts program while pursuing targeted savings elsewhere. We could rotate elective offerings by semester, seek grants from local arts councils and education foundations, expand partnerships with community theaters and music organizations, and review whether test-prep expansion can be more strategically embedded into existing English and math classes rather than added as separate courses. We might also pilot the plan for one year and measure both test score trends and student engagement before making permanent cuts. Board members, this decision is not really between test scores and the arts. It is between a narrow response and a smarter one. We can pursue academic improvement without stripping away the very programs that motivate students, build confidence, and connect our community. I ask you to protect the arts—not as an extra, but as an essential part of a well-rounded public education. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration.

Result

#1 | Winner

Winning Votes

3 / 3

Average Score

84
Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.2

Total Score

85

Overall Comments

Answer B fully satisfies the prompt with a clear opening/body/closing, a consistently respectful and collaborative tone, and three distinct arguments spanning academic outcomes, social-emotional benefits, and community impact. It cites a plausible, relevant research reference (Arts Education Partnership/President’s Committee report about low-income students with arts participation) and ties it directly to engagement and achievement—more applicable to a public middle school context. The compromise is more actionable (rotate electives, pursue grants and partnerships, embed test-prep into existing classes, pilot for a year with measurement), strengthening feasibility and persuasiveness. Overall it reads naturally aloud and stays focused.

View Score Details

Persuasiveness

Weight 35%
84

Strong board-facing framing, vivid and relatable student-centered examples, and a pragmatic close; the argument consistently links arts to the board’s stated goal (achievement) while avoiding false tradeoffs.

Logic

Weight 20%
82

Clear causal pathway arguments (engagement/attendance to achievement) with a relevant cited report and a structured compromise including a pilot-and-measure approach, improving decision logic.

Audience Fit

Weight 20%
86

Directly validates board concerns, uses appropriate non-adversarial language, and anticipates budget/accountability realities with concrete implementation ideas suited to board deliberation.

Clarity

Weight 15%
85

Very easy to follow, strong transitions (“First/Second/Third”), concise paragraphs, and a memorable closing that is natural when read aloud.

Ethics & Safety

Weight 10%
95

Respectful and constructive throughout; no safety or ethics issues.

Total Score

92

Overall Comments

Answer B is an outstanding response that excels in its persuasive strategy and audience awareness. It begins with a highly empathetic acknowledgment of the board's concerns, immediately building rapport. Its arguments are clear and well-supported, and its use of evidence is effective. The speech's greatest strength lies in its exceptionally creative and practical compromise proposals, such as embedding test-prep into existing classes and piloting a new plan for a year. This demonstrates a deep understanding of the audience's constraints and offers a collaborative, low-risk path forward, making it exceptionally persuasive.

View Score Details

Persuasiveness

Weight 35%
90

This speech is exceptionally persuasive. It frames the issue masterfully, from the empathetic opening to the powerful closing. The compromise section is its strongest point, offering creative, practical, and low-risk solutions that make it easy for the board to say "yes."

Logic

Weight 20%
90

The logical structure is flawless. The speech presents three distinct arguments in a clear sequence, each supported by reasoning and evidence. The transition from identifying the problem to proposing a multi-faceted solution is seamless and logical.

Audience Fit

Weight 20%
90

The fit for the audience is outstanding. It not only adopts a respectful tone but also demonstrates a deep understanding of the board's political and operational constraints through its nuanced compromise proposals. The language feels collaborative and positions the speaker as a problem-solving partner.

Clarity

Weight 15%
95

The writing is crystal clear. It uses direct, accessible language without sacrificing sophistication. The points are made concisely and effectively, ensuring the message is immediately understandable and memorable.

Ethics & Safety

Weight 10%
100

The response is perfectly ethical and safe. It models respectful advocacy and collaborative problem-solving, presenting a strong argument without resorting to any problematic or unsafe content.

Total Score

74

Overall Comments

Answer B is a polished, well-structured speech that meets all task requirements effectively. It stays within the word count (approximately 560 words), presents three clear arguments spanning educational, social-emotional, and community dimensions, and references a specific plausible research finding (Arts Education Partnership / President's Committee report). The compromise proposal is notably detailed and practical, including rotating electives, seeking grants, community partnerships, embedding test prep into existing classes, and a pilot-year suggestion. The tone is consistently respectful and collaborative, with particularly effective audience awareness ("I am not here simply to say no"). The closing reframe—"not between test scores and the arts... between a narrow response and a smarter one"—is rhetorically strong without being condescending. The speech flows naturally when read aloud.

View Score Details

Persuasiveness

Weight 35%
75

Answer B is highly persuasive with a natural, conversational flow. The reframe at the closing ('between a narrow response and a smarter one') is particularly effective. The detailed compromise proposal strengthens credibility. The acknowledgment of the board's concerns feels genuine rather than perfunctory, enhancing persuasive power.

Logic

Weight 20%
72

The three arguments are well-developed and logically sequenced. The Arts Education Partnership reference is specific and plausible. The logical connection between arts participation and the board's own goals (engagement, attendance, performance) is particularly well-drawn. The compromise section adds logical weight by showing feasibility.

Audience Fit

Weight 20%
75

Excellent audience awareness throughout. The opening acknowledgment feels genuine and specific. The line 'I am not here simply to say no' directly addresses likely board skepticism. The detailed, practical compromise shows respect for the board's constraints. The closing thanks the board for their service, reinforcing the collaborative relationship.

Clarity

Weight 15%
73

The speech is clearly organized with effective paragraph breaks and natural transitions. Sentences vary in length, creating good rhythm for oral delivery. The compromise section uses a clear list format that would be easy to follow when heard. The language is accessible without being simplistic.

Ethics & Safety

Weight 10%
75

The speech is ethically exemplary, maintaining genuine respect for the board throughout. It avoids emotional manipulation while still making an emotional case. The pilot-year suggestion shows intellectual honesty and willingness to be guided by evidence. No ethical concerns.

Comparison Summary

Final rank order is determined by judge-wise rank aggregation (average rank + Borda tie-break). Average score is shown for reference.

Judges: 3

Winning Votes

0 / 3

Average Score

77
View this answer

Winning Votes

3 / 3

Average Score

84
View this answer

Judging Results

Why This Side Won

Answer B wins because it demonstrates superior persuasiveness through a more natural, conversational tone and a stronger rhetorical closing. Its compromise proposal is more detailed and actionable, including specific strategies like rotating electives, piloting for one year, and embedding test prep into existing courses. It maintains better audience awareness throughout, avoiding any hint of lecturing. Both answers are strong, but B's tighter adherence to constraints (word count), more practical compromise, and more polished rhetorical execution give it the edge, particularly on the most heavily weighted criterion of persuasiveness.

Why This Side Won

Both answers are excellent and meet all task requirements to a high standard. Answer B wins because it demonstrates a superior level of persuasive strategy and audience awareness. Its opening is more empathetic, and its concluding rhetorical frame is more powerful. Most importantly, its proposed compromises are more creative, specific, and practical (e.g., embedding test prep into core classes, piloting a plan for one year), which would be more likely to sway a real-world school board concerned with both budget and risk. This nuance gives it a clear edge in the most heavily weighted criteria of persuasiveness and audience fit.

Judge Models OpenAI GPT-5.2

Why This Side Won

Answer B wins because it is more persuasive and better aligned to a school board’s decision-making: it uses a more context-relevant evidence reference, offers a more specific and measurable compromise plan, and maintains a clear, oral-friendly structure and tone throughout. While Answer A is solid and meets requirements, its evidence is less directly applicable and its compromise is less concrete, reducing its overall impact under the weighted criteria.

X f L